lunes, 27 de junio de 2016

Re/Insurance Business Leaders Begin to Comment on Post-Brexit World From Insurance Journal


Comparto con ustedes los recientes comentarios de las prinicipales autoridades relacionadas al quehacer de seguros en torno al Brexit (Retiro del Reino Unido de C E), y que espero lo encuentren de utilidad.  Hasta el próximo post ED.




The UK joined the European Union in January 1973, and yesterday, the UK public voted to leave. After 43 years of marriage, the divorce proceedings will soon begin.

No one knows how long it will take for the UK to untangle itself from the EU and its laws, but many commentators think it will take many years – at least a decade. Crucially, no one yet knows how Brexit will affect the City of London – the UK’s financial center.

The EU’s single financial passport, or passporting, allows re/insurers and other financial services companies the ability to conduct business across EU member states, establishing branch offices through one regulator in the UK

What will happen to the single passport when the UK’s membership of the EU expires in two years? While Article 50 of the 2009 Lisbon Treaty sets out the process of withdrawal for an EU member state, it’s never been triggered.

The procedure is this: when the UK prime minister notifies the EU about Britain’s intention to withdraw, negotiations will begin on the arrangement for leaving and for the UK’s future dealings with the remaining 27 member states. The Lisbon Treaty allows for up to two years of negotiations. If no agreement can be reached in this time period, the other member states either have to unanimously agree to extend the negotiation period, or Britain will have to exit with no deal in place.

Prime Minister David Cameron today announced his resignation, making way for a Tory leadership election to be completed by October. Cameron said he will let the new prime minister invoke Article 50.

The question of continued access to the single EU passport is a matter to be resolved in these negotiations.

Lloyd’s, the International Underwriting Association, the Association of British Insurers, Standard & Poor’s, the legal firm Clyde & Co., Allianz, and other financial services and re/insurance groups have begun to weigh in with their comments about this historic vote.

A wrap-up of their comments follow, in no particular order:

Lloyd’s of London. “I am confident that Lloyd’s will stay at the center of the global specialist insurance and reinsurance sector, and I look forward to continuing our valuable relationship with our European partners,” Lloyd’s Chairman John Nelson said. “For the next two years our business is unchanged. Lloyd’s has a well prepared contingency plan in place and Lloyd’s will be fully equipped to operate in the new environment.”
International Underwriting Association. The London insurance market “is resilient and well-positioned to respond to the result of the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU,” said a statement from the IUA, which noted that there will now be an extended period of negotiation to determine the exact terms upon which the UK exits the EU.
“Clearly the UK’s decision to exit the EU presents challenges for London market companies and uncertainty surrounding the potentially prolonged nature of this process will be problematic for future planning. Our industry is, however, experienced in responding to change,” said Dave Matcham, chief executive of the IUA.

“The free trade benefits of EU membership have been vital in maintaining London’s position as a global insurance hub and are highly valued by IUA members. This is true both for insurers headquartered in the UK and those international firms that use London as their center for European business,” he added.

“We know that many companies will now be considering their own individual responses. Continued access to European markets is essential and will, I expect, be at the forefront of the process to respond to the referendum decision. The IUA will be working with the London Market Group to ensure our industry’s views are fully represented as developments continue,” Matcham went on to say.

“Outside the EU it will still be desirable for UK supervisors to have reciprocal arrangements in place with other national regulators. Otherwise we will see a duplication of compliance costs that will damage companies and escalate costs for clients.”

 Standard & Poor’s. S&P Global Ratings said the leave vote is not expected to lead to rating actions on U.K. insurers. “We see the insurance sector as less exposed to the leave vote than the rest of the financial sector.”
 The insurance sector represents about one-third of the U.K.’s financial services net export surplus, but it is more reliant on trade with non-EU countries – especially the U.S., said S&P, noting that the sector is also a “very limited recipient of inward investment.”

“Even in the absence of any trade agreements or passporting rights, we believe that U.K. insurers operating in the EU could, through appropriate planning, continue their businesses largely uninterrupted. The same would apply for EU insurers who currently trade in the U.K. through branches,” said S&P.

The ratings agency acknowledged that there will be a period of uncertainty while treaties or other arrangements are negotiated between the U.K. and the EU, which could weigh on insurers’ investment returns and possibly on the rate of future economic growth. “However, we do not now believe that these potential issues are likely to lead to immediate rating actions on insurers.”

Association of British Insurers. “The UK insurance and long-term savings industry is strong and built to protect customers from market uncertainty and shocks,” said Huw Evans, director general of the ABI.
“Customers should remember we remain part of the EU until the process of leaving is complete and they should therefore avoid hasty decisions about their financial matters. For the UK government, it will be important now to focus on ensuring the UK remains a globally competitive place to do business with the best possible future trading network with the EU and the wider world,” he added.

British Insurance Brokers Association. BIBA said it will work with government and other authorities to ensure the best interests of insurance brokers and their customers are fully represented during the exit negotiations. “This is an unprecedented situation for the UK and BIBA is conscious that this will create a considerable amount of work and concern amongst members and their customers,” BIBA noted in its statement.
City of London Corp. “The City of London has thrived as a financial and trading centre for more than a thousand years and will continue to do so,” said Mark Boleat, policy chairman of the City of London Corp. “There will be no mass exit of banks and financial institutions from the Square Mile.” Boleat admitted there will be uncertainty as Brexit negotiations go on, but the City of London is “still the financial centre of the fifth-largest economy in the world.”
The task ahead is to “secure the best deal we can in the negotiations that will follow this vote,” he said. “The general view of the city is that the government should push for the UK to retain our access to the single market. Any other option will fail to provide proper arrangements for financial services and risks damaging this vital industry.”

Association of Insurance and Risk Managers in Industry and Commerce (Airmic). The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) revealed prior to the referendum that only 50 percent of FTSE companies had made contingency plans for an exit vote with levels of preparedness varying significantly across the sectors, said Airmic, the UK’s risk management association, in a statement issued today in response to the Brexit vote.
“As with any risk that might affect the whole organization, Brexit is an enterprise risk and the potential impact should be broken down by considering different areas of the business and the relevant risks including people, sales, regulation, law, finance, information, technology and insurance,” said Julia Graham, deputy CEO of Airmic. These principles of a resilient organization are outlined in the Airmic’s “Roads to Resilience” report.

Clyde & Co. Andrew Holderness, global head of Corporate Insurance Group at Clyde & Co., the London-based, global legal firm, offered some suggestions about what re/insurance businesses can expect after Brexit and their next potential steps.
Insurers, reinsurers and intermediaries “need to review the scale of their operations from continental Europe into the UK, or vice versa, and determine what impact losing it might have on their overall balance sheet. If it’s critical, or if they want to continue writing it, they have a number of options: acquiring another business to provide the right platform, establishing a branch or subsidiary – or finding another business to front for them,” he said, noting that if operations are marginal, the sale of the renewal rights or a portfolio transfer should be considered.

“Without passporting, the level of regulation will undoubtedly rise. It is also very likely that the overall demands on the regulators themselves will increase significantly. This will then have knock-on effect and could impact their speed of response to a range of issues such as requests for approvals and rule waivers or modifications,” Holderness said.

The status of employees also must be considered – whether they are utilizing the free movement of citizens regime permitted under EU law. Holderness suggested that companies conduct an audit to identify which members of staff are affected and whether than can remain in their posts following the vote.

“Alongside the greater administrative burden, there may well be increased employment costs. It is important to align this work very closely with decisions on possible structures, so that any changes to the organization designed to secure ongoing access to markets take into account how that might affect the location of senior management and other staff,” he continued.

Allianz. “Today is not a good day for Europe,” said Allianz in a commentary titled “Britain Votes to Leave: A Leap in the Dark.” Allianz went on to say that repercussions from the Brexit vote will be felt for years to come in the U.K. and across Europe because Brexit is a process, not an event, and will sap the EU’s political energy for many years.
“In the short run, we expect severe financial market turmoil, compounded by political instability in the U.K. Heightened uncertainty will reduce U.K. GDP growth by 1-2 percentage points per year while London and Brussels seek to come to an agreement about a new bilateral relationship. Unilateral decisions by the UK, e.g. to restrict EU migration, would prompt retaliation and would make negotiations even more difficult.”

By acting in a collaborative manner, “British and European policymakers can do much to reduce any disruptions to trade and capital flows,” said Michael Heise, Allianz chief economist. “Even if the European project from now on will move forward without Britain, the UK is bound to remain a key ally of the European Union warranting close political, economic and financial ties.”

Insurance Europe. “We are deeply saddened to hear that the people of the United Kingdom have voted to leave the European Union. We now hope that policymakers can work quickly to limit the impact that this time of uncertainty will have on both consumers and businesses,” said Sergio Balbinot, president of Insurance Europe, the Brussels-based European re/insurance federation.

Fuente: Reproduccion de Insurance Journal Newslatter 

miércoles, 11 de mayo de 2016

Carta a las aseguradoras


Desde el 16 de abril, fecha en la que ocurrió el terremoto que ha afectado mayoritariamente a las provincias de Manabí, Esmeraldas, Guayas, Los Ríos entre otras, los distintos medios de prensa, y las redes sociales,  nos han ofrecido diferentes testimonios;  de los afectados, de las autoridades y del sector asegurador.  Hemos leído y escuchado, que un corredor ha pagado en anticipos equis cantidad a un asegurado, lo mismo lo afirma una compañía de seguros, y desde luego, hemos testimoniado, como la Federación de Empresas de seguros, hizo una declaración en un canal de televisión, posteriormente lo siguió el Gerente de Seguros Sucre representante de la aseguradora del estado ecuatoriano.



Lo que llama la atención, es que el gremio asegurador no se pronuncie en torno a la tragedia y el momento que vive el sector.  Este es sin duda el instante  más importante que puede tener en su experiencia el seguro en el Ecuador, es la hora que el gremio como tal, en representación de todas las aseguradoras y Corredores de seguros, demuestre de lo que es capaz de aportar en circunstancias, que sin duda son críticas, como  aliado estratégico, del industrial, del comerciante, del ser humano en general.  Ahora es cuando debemos poner más luz y confianza  en nuestra actividad.   


Los corredores de seguros no pagamos reclamos, los corredores los gestionamos ante la aseguradora con nuestro conocimiento y experiencia, son las compañías las que los pagan, y son estas (sin que medien las Cámaras,  Federaciones o  Asociaciones), las que deben procurar información de las bondades de tener una cobertura de seguros, todo lo demás suena a propaganda muy barata. Es hora que todos los que hacen el quehacer en seguros se unan en una sola voz y depongan intereses, regionales, políticos, económicos y más, para convertir esta experiencia en un argumento que genere confianza para con el porvenir de la actividad.  Hasta aquí el presente post. ED. 

martes, 29 de marzo de 2016


COMPAÑIAS DE SEGUROS:
ANALISIS DEL EJERCICIO 2015

Tenemos las cifras del año 2015 y hemos procedido a practicarles un sucinto análisis que nos permitirá tener una visión de la industria del seguro de cara al 2016 y  de como concluyó el ejercicio comercial pasado.  Para efectos del mismo, es importante observar que está basado en la información de la página web de la Superintendencia de Compañías, Valores y Seguros  (SCVS), que como institución reguladora tiene a bien informar al público en su portal.

Las primas totales del sistema fueron del orden de 1.295.372.206,43 millones de dólares de los Estados Unidos de América, para seguros generales, es decir, no se incluyen a las compañías dedicadas al seguro de Vida.    Las compañías de seguros que operan este ramo avisaron primas totales por un valor de 369.507.974,37 dólares, quedando el sistema en un gran total de 1.664.880.180,80 dólares.

Las utilidades demostradas en los estados financieros ofrecidos a la SCVS, indican lo siguiente;  las aseguradoras dedicadas a ramos generales tuvieron 18.163.625,53 dólares en gananciales en el periodo del año 2015, mientras que aquellas dedicadas a Vida indicaron que ganaron 31.365685.03 dólares, esto da un gran total de utilidad del ramo de 49.799.310,56 dólares.
Si estas cifras se contrastan con sus símiles del año 2014 veremos los siguientes números y porcentajes:



Primas totales del sistema 2014: 1.702.922.587,96  US$.
Primas totales del sistema 2015: 1.664.880.180,80

Diferencia porcentual: -2.24%

Utilidades totales del sistema 2014: 70.422.296.02
Utilidades totales del sistema 2015: 49.799.310.56

Diferencia porcentual: -29.28%

Es decir que la recaudación de primas durante el ejercicio 2015 fue inferior en 4.47% a las recibidas por el sector en el año 2014 y las utilidades se contrajeron aún más, en un 29.28%.



El comportamiento descrito tiene una explicación lógica, el Gobierno Nacional ordenó para fines del 2014 que no se podrían hacer cesiones de primas a los reaseguradores en los ramos de Vehículos, Vida y Accidentes Personales, debiendo hacerse una retención propia cada compañia de seguros cercana al 100% en todos esos ramos.   Esta medida (hecha por funcionarios que con toda certeza no conocen de la operación técnica de seguros y reaseguros), obliga a las aseguradoras a hacer una suscripción (aceptación de riesgos),  especialmente el ramo de vehículos (el de mayor incidencia en las primas)  más conservadora, , justamente porque no tienen ya con quien compartir en el exterior con un reasegurador.  Además, esta medida obliga a establecer mayores Reservas para riesgos en curso, hasta un 40% de las primas emitidas recibidas, y las primas que se trasladan a las reservas se convierten en   pasivos que no se liberan sino después del aniversario de la póliza, y esto, siempre y cuando no exista un siniestro.  Entran pues acá ya otras consideraciones adicionales, como el concepto de Siniestralidad de Caja, Burning Cost, para medir y precautelar los resultados tanto técnicos como financieros de las aseguradoras.

Consecuentemente con lo expuesto, el Gobierno también es un perdedor en esta operación, pues habrá recaudado un IVA menor al del 2015, e impuestos a la salida de divisas en un significativo menor porcentaje todavía, habría que examinar el ramo de vehículos y compararlo con el del 2014 y 2013, para graficar el impacto.  Este es el resultado de la medida que es desafortunado desde todos los puntos de vista en forma inequívoca.

La compañía con mayores primas fue Seguros Sucre S.A. con 186.860.848,70 para seguros generales y 21.415.362.58 para seguros de vida con un gran total de 208.276.211.28 dólares de gestión en primas. Seguros Sucre S.A. es el buque insignia en materia de seguros del gobierno nacional, compartiendo con Rocafuerte Seguros S.A. la responsabilidad de proteger los activos públicos del Ecuador.  Siguen a Seguros Sucre, Seguros Equinoccial S.A., AIG-Metropolitana, Rocafuerte Seguros, Liberty Seguros, Ecuatoriano Suiza, Mapfre-Atlas entre las mas destacadas. 

QBE-Colonial filial del de la gigante Australiana del mismo nombre, ocupa el tercer renglón, seguido muy de cerca por el grupo ACE, este último adquirió a Chubbs por 28.3 billones de dolares el 15 julio de 2015 a Chubbs.  Seguros Pichincha con relación comercial directa con el banco del mismo nombre ostenta el primer puesto en cuanto a primas devengadas en seguros de vida, con 88.905347,61, seguida por Equivida con algo más de 69 millones. (El cuadro completo de los resultados los puede  VER AQUÍ).

La expectativa para este año (2016), será llegar a un resultado técnico en el cual las reservas liberadas más las primas suscritas,  menos los siniestros del ejercisio , superen a las nuevas reservas que se establezcan, esto será la clave de una operación exitosa, especialmente en el ramo de vehículos.  Hasta el próximo Post ED


N d A.:
 No se tomaron en cuenta Primma, Cervantes, Censeg, Porvenir, Produseguros, Bolívar, Coopseguros.
 FUENTE: Superintendencia de Compañias, Valores  y Seguros

INTERPRETANDO LAS CIFRAS DEL 2025.

  El nuevo mapa del seguro ecuatoriano: concentración, técnica y poder de escala Por Gustavo Zevallos Baquerizo Hay momentos en los mercad...